Legal Opinion

Weber Chimney Co. v. Johnson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1917No. Gen. No. 22,842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lockwood Honobe, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

2. Attachment, § 3*—when act construed strictly. An attachment is an extraordinary remedy, and the act is strictly construed against the party seeking to enforce its drastic provisions. 3. Attachment—when grounds of must be strictly proven. There are no presumptions in favor of plaintiffs in attachment suits; the grounds of attachment must be strictly proven. 4. Attachment—residence as question of fact. The question of residence in an attachment suit is one of fact. 5. Domicile, § 4*—what considered in determining residence. The question of residence is largely a matter of intent. 6. Appeal…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ezydorski v. KrozkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. National Mutual Church Insurance v. MagillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API