Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Eskue

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1978No. 6703Published

1Concurrence

*819OSBORN; Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the opinion by Chief Justice Preslar and feel compelled to do more than remand for a new trial with no guidance to the trial Court concerning the first issue which was submitted to the jury, and to which counsel for Appellant made numerous objections.

In Olson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 477 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.1972), Justice Greenhill noted that the Workmen’s Compensation Act was not intended to provide health insurance, but was designed to provide compensation for incapacity flowing from an accidental personal injury. That position was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Olson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Denbow v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Great American Indemnity Co. v. SamsTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API