Legal Opinion

Colston v. Bean

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 31, 1906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Case for deceit.- Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1904, Windsor County, Watson, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The burden was on the defendant to prove that he had the permission of the mortgagee to sell the wagons. “He who affirms must prove.”

Read the full summary

Case for deceit.- Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1904, Windsor County, Watson, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The burden was on the defendant to prove that he had the permission of the mortgagee to sell the wagons. “He who affirms must prove.” Patee v. Pelt on, 48 Vt. 182; Simonton v. Winter, 5 Pet. 141; x Rice Ev. 111, 112; Tucker v. Maryland, 46 D. R. A. 181; Frost v. Berkeley etc., Co., 26 L. R. A. 694; Hay v. Peterson, 34 D. R. A. 581. The only plea was the general issue. He who alleges fraud must prove it.…

1Opinion of the Court

Tyre®, J.

Action, case for the defendant’s alleged fraud in a sale to the plaintiff of certain wagons as free from incumbrance, when they were incumbered by a mortgage to W. H. Dubois; defence, that by an agreement with Dubois the defendant had a right to sell the wagons, also-, that’ the plaintiff bought them with knowledge of the mortgage.

The court instructed the jury that, as the plaintiff had alleged fraud in the sale, the burden was upon him to prove it by a preponderance of the evidence. The plaintiff contends that this was error; that, as the defendant had attempted to justify .the sale…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bosworth v. Chas. DeF. BancroftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API