Legal Opinion

Haislup v. Union Asphalt Construction Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1919No. 9,857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (25,982); Louis B. Etvbanic, Judge. Action by Alfred T. Haislup against the Union Asphalt Construction Company, in which defendant cross-complained. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.

Appellant filed his complaint in the Marion Circuit Court against the appellee to quiet title to certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, located within 150 feet of New York street, in said city, which said real estate was subject to assessment lien for the improvement of a portion of said street passing in front of said real estate. Appellee filed •his cross-complaint in such cause against appellant to foreclose said lien. Issues were formed on both the complaint and the cross-complaint, and there was a trial by the court, which resulted in a finding and judgment against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vickery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Anheier v. FowlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Phillips v. Kankakee Reclamation Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kellems v. Republic Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Webster v. Independent Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. YatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API