Legal Opinion

Tuller v. Central School District No. 1

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.

These cross appeals involve a probationary period imposed by section 210 (subd 2, par [f]) of the Civil Service Law (commonly known as the Taylor Law) upon public school teachers because they had participated in an illegal strike.

The petitioners, two tenured teachers, participated in the strike against the respondent school district in October of 1972. As a result, by operation of law, they were placed on probation for a period of one year, the penalty specified in section 210 (subd 2, par [Q) of the Civil Service Law, in their case to run from October 6, 1972 to October 6, 1973. In March of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People Ex Rel. Kastor v. . KearnyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Going v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Going v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Kiernan v. LindsayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Venes v. Community School BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Major v. DeFrenchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pauk v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Yanoff v. CommissionerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Green v. Commissioner of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API