Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Bank of Commerce v. McNeill Trucking Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1992No. 91-215Published

1ConcurrenceRobert H. Dudley, Justice

I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion and write separately to set out two procedural issues involving punitive damages that I hope someday will be brought before us in an adversarial manner.

The appellant, plaintiff below, argues that he should have been awarded punitive damages because the appellee, the defendant trucking company, operated its tractor without a trailer, and a tractor without a trailer cannot be stopped within a safe distance. The appellant contends that the trucking company knew of this danger and yet, in order to profit, operated the tractor without a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. National By-Products, Inc. v. Searcy House Moving Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Freeman v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Alpha Zeta Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API