State v. Fairbanks-Morse & Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*654On Rehearing.
YOUNG, Justice.
The State’s anti-trust suit for final injunction and penalties (against Fairbanks-Morse, $50 to $1,500' per day from January 1, 1938 to date of petition, June 9, 1948) is for all practical purposes a criminal action and subject to the same rules of strict construction. Ford Motor Co. v. State, 142 Tex. 5, 175 S.W.2d 230; also subject to the stringent rule of pleading applicable to injunctions “that ‘the aver-ments of material and essential elements must be sufficiently certain to negative every inference of the existence of facts under which petitioner would not be…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- New York Ex Rel. Rogers v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- Gates v. HooperTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.