Legal Opinion

State v. Maddox

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1977No. 37581PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Defendant, Thomas Wesley Maddox, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree. Defendant argues that the state’s evidence against him was insufficient to sustain a guilty verdict and that certain evidence was improperly admitted.

Rule 27.20(a) requires that a motion for new trial shall be filed before judgment and within 10 days after the return of the verdict absent an application for and the court’s approval of an extension of time. The record does not reflect that defendant requested or was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MaxieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. LarrabeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. ThurmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. EatonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API