Southwell v. Robertson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
Leave was given to submit briefs.
This case was tried after the new Procedure Rules went into effect. What more than a change in terminology they effect is doubtful. Before them and without them what was done in this case was to grant a non-suit. The plaintiff’s remedy under the Pennsylvania practice would be or at least might be, to move to take off the non-suit. If the motion prevailed the case would be retried. It thus had the effect of a motion for a new trial. If the motion to take off the non-suit was refused, under the Pennsylvania practice, it had the effect…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Riss & Co. v. Association of Western RailwaysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958