Legal Opinion

The People v. Mulack

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1968No. 40986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

This is an appeal from a conviction in a bench trial of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Defendant was fined $100 and costs. His theory is that use of “Breathalyzer” tests and “Field Visual” tests violated his constitutional right to counsel under the doctrine of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602.

The defendant was arrested about 4 A.M. after a deputy sheriff observed him driving erratically by spinning his wheels, weaving from lane to lane and making a “U” turn. The officer smelled a strong odor of liquor on defendant and placed him…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. McAvoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. People v. HalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Village of Algonquin v. FordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API