Legal Opinion

Crecium v. McCann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1949No. Appeal, 70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

This was an action of trespass vi et armis, to recover damages for the unjust detention of possession of real estate by the defendants. The plaintiff declared for damages at $45.00 a month from February 10, 1944, to June 15,1945, and from March 19,1946, to July 3 of that year. Sarah M. McCann, one of the defendants, executed and delivered to plaintiff, on February 10, 1944, a deed for the premises in question. Thereafter she and her son refused possession and filed a bill in equity to cancel the deed, which action was unsuccessful. The plaintiff then brought an action of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Reiter v. ReiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Dawson v. M'GillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DunlopUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Chase, J. v. Creegan, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Hanson v. Wintersteen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API