Legal Opinion

Feimster-Peterson, Inc. v. Florida A & M University

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1992No. 92-00214Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final order of the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) awarding a bid to Feimster-Peterson, Inc. (Feimster). Feimster contends, inter alia, that the hearing officer (HO) erred in exceeding the scope of the issues presented at the bid protest hearing.

The facts are essentially undisputed. Appellant, the second-lowest bidder on the project to repaint and renovate Bragg Stadium, was successful in having the low bidder disqualified. Thereafter, however, FAMU rejected all bids because appellant’s bid was allegedly in excess of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leonard Bros. Transfer & Storage Co. v. DouglassSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. Nest v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Sanders v. BUREAU OF CRI. COMPENSATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Baxter v. Florida Career Service CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Courtenay v. DHRSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API