Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2009No. 22931Published

1Opinion of the Court

2009 SD 70

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, ET. AL., INCLUDING CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 22931

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued April 29, 2009

Opinion Filed August 5, 2009

ARLO D. SOMMERVOLD, Sommervold Law Firm, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

RICHARD J. GRAY, TIMOTHY M. BURNS, ZACHARY V. MOEN, Jenner & Block, LLC Chicago, Illinois Attorneys for plaintiff and appellant.

CHARLES M. THOMPSON, May, Adam, Gerdes, & Thompson, LLP, Pierre, South…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Beanstalk Group, Inc. v. Am General Corporation and General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi MarineIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Canron, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API