State v. McDonald
Oregon Supreme Court
Submitted on briefs on motion to dismiss; From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge.' Statement Pee Curiam. This was originally a proceeding begun to recover for the use of the State of Oregon certain property in Union County as upon an escheat.
Read the full summary
Submitted on briefs on motion to dismiss; From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge.' Statement Pee Curiam. This was originally a proceeding begun to recover for the use of the State of Oregon certain property in Union County as upon an escheat. The State having obtained judgment, the ease was brought here on appeal and reversed in an opinion reported at 55 Or. 419 (103 Pac. 512: 104 Pac. 967: 106 Pac. 444). The State having again prevailed in a'second trial in the circuit court, the case was again appealed and the decision below affirmed. 59 Or. 520 (117 Pac. 381). It seems that Charles E. and…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
Section 7370, L. O. L., provides:
“In any judgment rendered or that has heretofore been rendered by any court of competent jurisdiction, escheating real property to the State, on motion of the district attorney, the court shall make an order that said real property be sold by the sheriff of the proper county, where the same is situated, at public auction for cash in the same manner as real estate is sold on execution * * and the sheriff shall out of the proceeds of such sale pay the costs thereof and pay the costs of said proceeding incurred on behalf of the State in accordance with and…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Hamilton v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1892
4Cited by6 opinions
- Olcott v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Johnson v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Van Zandt v. ParsonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re Brooks' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.