Legal Opinion

Temple v. Jones, Son & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1942No. Record No. 2476PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

The original style of the case, in which this proceeding had its inception, was H. S. Culbreth, receiver of the Brunswick Bank & Trust Company v. E. R. Temple, et als. It was in the nature of a hen creditors’ suit, instituted in March, 1938, for the purpose of subjecting the lands of E. R. Temple to the hens outstanding thereon. Jones, Son & Company, Inc., was not originally a party to the cause but became such by filing a petition therein on September 8, 1939, first, praying that a certain deed from E. R. Temple to E. C. Temple under date of February 17, 1938, conveying to E. C. Temple…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lamar's Ex'or v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  2. Hutcheson v. Savings Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Neff v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Fowlkes v. TuckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mortarino v. Consultant Engineering Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
  3. In Re DeckerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969
  4. First National Bank of Fairbanks v. EnzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Moore v. Manson (In Re Springfield Furniture, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API