Sapiro v. Levenstein
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HENDRY, Judge.
The appellant Samuel T. Sapiro, one of three sets of defendants below, seeks review of a $50,000.00 judgment entered individually against him and in favor of plaintiff-appellee Leonard L. Levenstein in a jury trial. Levenstein brought an action for breach of a clause concerning “adequate water and sewer facilities” contained in a written deposit receipt contract for the sale of realty.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict in his behalf at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case or at the end of all the evidence. We agree for the reasons that he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Biscayne Realty & Insurance v. Ostend Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, Florence Lustig Crossman v. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Jefferson Realty of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levenstein v. SapiroSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Russell v. GansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Sapiro v. LevensteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973