Legal Opinion

Sapiro v. Levenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1972No. 71-1244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellant Samuel T. Sapiro, one of three sets of defendants below, seeks review of a $50,000.00 judgment entered individually against him and in favor of plaintiff-appellee Leonard L. Levenstein in a jury trial. Levenstein brought an action for breach of a clause concerning “adequate water and sewer facilities” contained in a written deposit receipt contract for the sale of realty.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict in his behalf at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case or at the end of all the evidence. We agree for the reasons that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Biscayne Realty & Insurance v. Ostend Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, Florence Lustig Crossman v. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Jefferson Realty of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levenstein v. SapiroSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Russell v. GansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Sapiro v. LevensteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API