Legal Opinion

State v. Page

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1986No. C6-85-1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery, second degree assault, third degree assault, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He appeals, claiming the trial court improperly admitted evidence against him and allowed improper conduct by the prosecutor. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Norman Malterud and appellant Barry Page lived near one another in Minneapolis. The two became acquainted, although there is no indication that they became close friends.

At around 11 p.m. on March 10, 1985, appellant entered Malterud’s apartment building, which is protected…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. PelawaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. BrachbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. BrachbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. State v. ReyesNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API