Legal Opinion
Friedland v. Argentor Holding Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 30, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Finch, J.:
This controversy arises out of a written contract created by the parties, and this appeal raises but a single question of law, namely, the proper construction of certain provisions of said agreement. The facts, in so far as necessary to present the question herein decided, are, briefly, as follows: The plaintiff’s assignor agreed in writing to purchase certain real property from the defendant for $180,000, paying $1,000 on the signing of the contract; $34,500 in cash on the delivery of the deed; and the balance on mortgage. The contract provided for taking title on June 10, 1924.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Ketchum & Sweet v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Havens v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Page v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Sanford v. . Brown Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collar City Partnership I v. Redemption Church of Christ of Apostolic FaithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rollton Syndicate, Inc. v. WidlitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Evans v. NorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Blue Bird, Inc. v. Consolidated Royal Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Powers v. MulfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956