Legal Opinion

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Spears

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1992No. 92-626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) sought reimbursement from Shirley Palmer Spears for the purported overpayment of food stamps issued to Dorletha Berry. The trial court dismissed DHS’s claim with prejudice and determined that Ms. Spears was not liable for the debt because she did not eat at least fifty percent (50 %) of her meals in Ms. Berry’s house. On appeal, DHS contends that the trial court’s determination that Ms. Spears was required to have fifty percent of her meals in the Berry household to be considered a household member was clearly erroneous. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Pocahontas v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Womack v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Books-A-Million, Inc. v. Arkansas Painting & Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Womack v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API