Legal Opinion
HILLCREST INVESTMENT v. Sandy City
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided July 22, 2010No. 20090481-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
T1 Hillerest Investment and other individuals and entities claiming to be successors in interest to Bell Mountain Corporation (collectively, Hillcrest) appeal from the district court's entry of judgment in favor of Sandy City (the City). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 In 1970, the Horman family (the Hor-mans) purchased approximately 1000 acres of land (the Horman Properties) located in unincorporated Salt Lake County, Utah. The Hormans' intent was to develop the Horman Properties into a subdivision that would be annexed by the City. The anticipated name of the subdivision was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilburn v. Interstate ElectricCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Nielsen v. Gold's GymUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Mellor v. Wasatch Crest Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Tech Center 2000, LLC v. ZRII, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Cove at Little Valley v. Traverse RidgeUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- Holladay Bank & Trust v. Gunnison Valley BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. SmaistralaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018