Grandhagen v. Grandhagen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
1. The first issue presented is whether there is evidence to sustain the findings of the jury that Oscar Grandhagen was guilty of negligence. The defendants contend that he was required to act in a sudden emergency and that the injuries sustained by Tina Grandhagen were caused by unavoidable accident.
Oscar Grandhagen testified that he was looking ahead *317watching the road, with both hands on the steering wheel, when an occupant of the car called his attention to the fact that there was a bee on his arm; that, keeping his left hand on the steering wheel, he struck at the bee with his right hand,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Morgan v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Papke v. HaerleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Duby v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by17 opinions
- Waters v. MarkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- Fly v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Nimmer v. PurtellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Banchs v. Humberto ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.