Legal Opinion
Mugalli v. New York State Liquor Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed with costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent’s determination that petitioner’s knowing possession of stolen property violated 9 NYCRR 53.1 (n) (improper conduct by the licensee on or off the licensed premises of such a nature that would lead respondent to deny the issuance of a license or any renewal thereof) is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-182; Matter of Diegelman v State of New York Liq. Auth., 50 AD2d 720). In light of petitioner’s conduct and history of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vicari v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- International Fidelity Insurance v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Daniels v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Diegelman v. State of New York Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quintana v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Shelton v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- QUINTANA, ROBERT v. CITY OF BUFFALOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Quintana v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014