Legal Opinion

Ark. Highway Comm. v. Warnock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1967No. 5-4107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Justice.

This is an eminent domain proceeding brought by the Arkansas' State Highway Commission (appellant) to condemn (for highway purposes) approximately 15% acres across 140 acres of land owned by Wesley Warnock and wife (appellees).

Appellant deposited in the trial court $8,000 as estimated compensation for the taking, but the jury awarded compensation in the amount of $30,000.

On appeal to this Court appellant relies on only one ground for reversal: There is “no substantial evidence” to support the verdict.

It is correctly stated by appellant that the question of whether or not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ByarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. PtakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Myers v. Ark. State Highway Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. LlewellynCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Lindsey v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API