Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1924No. 4 Div. 900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

It was competent and relevant for the witness Robinson to testify that he (witness) had a hammer in his hand at the time he walked between the parties who were engaged in a mutual rencontre which resulted in the death of one of the combatants. This testimony related to the res gestee.

Every fact relating to and connected with a difficulty resulting in the death of one of the parties is relevant, and is a part of the res gesta; until the entire difficulty is over and has been abandoned by both parties. When one man cuts another, mortally wounding him, and the two are separated by a third party,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biggers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API