Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 27, 2007No. 05765Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lu, John T., J.

INTRODUCTION

The Plaintiff, John Doe #3152 (Doe), filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the Sex Offender Registry Board (Board) about twenty-seven days after the board classified him as a Level II sex offender. He now seeks leave to file his complaint late. Concluding that sex offender registry proceedings are most like civil cases, and therefore, the court lacks the discretion to grant the motion, the court denies the request.

DISCUSSION

A.G.L. 30A, §14(1)

Section §14(1) of G.L. 30A provides that an appeal from an administrative proceeding “shall... be commenced in the court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API