Legal Opinion

Asmuth v. Kemper

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 6, 1961No. 245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christie, J.:

The plaintiff, Henry Asmuth filed an action against Franklin Kemper alleging that he was injured while riding in an automobile driven by Kemper. In the first claim for relief he alleges that Kemper drove with willful or wanton disregard of the rights of others; in the second claim he alleges that Kemper drove negligently. Asmuth’s and Kemper’s depositions have been taken and affidavits by Kemper and his wife, Shirley Kemper, have been taken.

The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that there is no dispute as to any material fact and that on the facts the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Kerstetter v. ElfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Wilkes v. MeliceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eustice v. RupertSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Truitt v. GainesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  3. James Walter Truitt, a Minor, by Howard Truitt, His Next Friend, and Pearl L. Truitt, and Howard Truitt, Individually v. Russell Lowell GainesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. Cook v. PryorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Boyd v. HammondSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API