Haber, Blum, Bloch Hat Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Hodges. City court of Macon. March 11, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtTuknek, J.
1. A special demurrer which is founded on the terms of a contract neither set out in the petition nor made in any way a part thereof will not be .considered.
2. Where a subscriber to a telephone exchange at one place desired to communicate with his regular counsel in another place, was refused the long-distance connection, contrary to an alleged contract, and avers that in consequence of such refusal he (the said subscriber) paid unnecessarily and unjusily a delinquent employee one hundred and seventy-five dollars to get rid of him and to recover from him certain property entrusted to him, and…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Hadden v. Southern Messenger ServiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Copeland v. DunehooCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Twin City Lumber Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Sparks Milling Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.