Legal Opinion

Ex parte Momo Tomimatsu

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 26, 1916No. 15970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Habeas corpus by Momo Tomimatsu. On return to the petition for the writ.

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, District Judge.

[1] Petitioner, a Japanese woman, came here with a passport from the Japanese government, to join her husband, who is a Japanese domiciled in this country. She was refused admission by a board of special inquiry because afflicted with trachoma, a dangerous contagious disease. It is urged on her behalf that this board was not legally constituted, because its members were not all immigration officials; one of them being a clerk in the immigration service. Section 25 of the Immigration Act provides:.

“Each board [of special inquiry] shall consist of three members, who…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. City of SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. United States Ex Rel. Minuto v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API