Legal Opinion

Barr v. Matlock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1953No. 5-22PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This appeal stems from a traffic mishap, which occurred when a car in which appellee, Mrs. Matlock, was riding was involved in a collision with a gravel truck driven by Morton, claimed to be the servant of the defendants, Lambert and Barr, the appellants here. We will refer to the parties as they were styled in the Trial Court.

The defendants, Lambert and Barr, were under contract to have gravel transported from a point north of Lewisville, in Lafayette County, to an oil field west of Lewisville. The trucks, loaded with gravel, traveled West on U. S. Highway 82, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. SpottsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Hobbs-Western Co. v. CarmicalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Ellis & Lewis v. WarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Ellis Lewis v. WarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips Cooperative Gin Co. v. TollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Deam v. O. L. Puryear & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Clark v. Arkansas Democrat CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Clark v. Arkansas Democrat CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API