Sedelbauer v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Presiding Judge.
Sedelbauer was convicted by a jury of distributing obscene matter. 1 On appeal, he raises the following issues:(1) Whether the film he distributed is obscene as a matter of law;(2) Whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding that Sedelbauer had knowledge of the nature of the film he sold;(3) Whether the court erred in refusing Sedelbauer’s proposed instruction that prurient appeal should be measured by the impact of the film on the particular deviant group for which he claims the film was designed;(4) Whether the court erred in refusing to allow expert…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Sedelbauer v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sedelbauer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Sedelbauer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Sant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Webb v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. HanserdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Webb v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991