Lincoln Life & Annuity Co. v. Caswell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
McGuire, J. (concurring).
I agree that this case is controlled by McCarthy v Aetna Life Ins. Co. (92 NY2d 436 [1998]), and that Caswell’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted to the extent of declaring him the sole beneficiary of the ‘854 policy. I agree as well that given the conflicting claims to the policy proceeds, plaintiff properly commenced this interpleader action and sought to be discharged of its obligations under the policy. Although I also agree that the branch of plaintiff s cross motion seeking costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneys’ fees under CPLR 1006…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McCarthy v. Aetna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investments Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Fischbein v. Tova Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982