Legal Opinion

In the Matter of H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc., Bankrupt. James B. Kilsheimer, Iii, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Beol, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 1968No. 210, Docket 31752Published

1Per curiam

The somewhat intricate history of the previous litigation in this case is set forth in the opinion rendered by Judge Mansfield in reversing the determination of the referee. 274 F.Supp. 739 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

We affirm on the ground that, as Judge Mansfield held, the trustee is bound by the result in the state court action to which he made himself a party, with the consent of the bankruptcy court, by voluntary intervention.

“A bankruptcy trustee who by choice or by necessity resorts to a state court for the prosecution of a claim is of course bound by the adjudication made in the state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. GerdesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Fischer v. Pauline Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Winchester v. HeiskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Winchester, Trustee, and Others v. Heiskell and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. In re H. S. Dorf & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API