Legal Opinion

State v. Elmourabit

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. C7-84-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (Supp.1983), and disorderly conduct, Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(1), (3) (1982). He appeals from these convictions and from an order denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. The jury also found appellant guilty of speeding but he does not appeal from that conviction. We reverse.

FACTS

Arrest

On April…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State, City of Eagan v. ElmourabitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. TeskeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API