Legal Opinion
Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. Andrews
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 5, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The complaint fails to allege that the membership authorized or ratified the acts committed by some of the union’s members and, therefore, it is insufficient against the union’s officers. (Martin v. Curran, 303 N. Y. 276.) For those reasons the injunction should not have been issued against the officers as such. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See 280 App. Div. 806.]
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nathan's Famous, Inc. v. Local. 1115New York Supreme Court · 1972
- Rochdale Village, Inc. v. BeverlyNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Communications Workers of America District 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Communications Workers of America District 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Communications Workers of America District 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.