Legal Opinion

Durant v. Home Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1924No. 11541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for damages for the conversion of certain crops, seized under a crop mortgage given by the husband of the owner of certain lands. The plaintiff, a share cropper of the husband, claimed that the crop seized had been set off to him as his share, or that he had a statutory lien as such share cropper or laborer upon it, for his share. Verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant-appeals.

The facts were these: During the year 1920, one Josephine Brown was the owner of a tract of land in Barnwell County. It was cultivated, as was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peeples v. Werner & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  2. Graham v. SeigniousSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  3. Drake v. WhaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  4. Michalson v. AllSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. Sanders v. Standard Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waldrop v. M. J. Finance CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Little v. RiversSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API