Legal Opinion

Bialy v. Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1905No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Case made from Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by Robert C. Bialy against Bay City to recover taxes paid under protest. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit to recover the amount of certain personal property and real estate taxes for the year 1903 paid by him under protest, and also for real-estate taxes paid under protest by the Fraser House Company, Stoddard, and Grant for the same year, the claims for which were duly assigned to *497him, amounting altogether to $3,307.62 and interest. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The facts found by the court, or so much thereof as may be necessary to print for the purposes of this case, are as follows:

The State and county tax rolls forth© year 1902, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of State Tax Commissioners v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Prairie Oil Gas Co. v. Cruce, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. School District No. 9, Pittsfield Township v. Washtenaw County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API