Legal Opinion

Fish v. Toner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Traverse county, and from an order by G. L. Brown, J., denying his motion to modify the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This proceeding was instituted in justice court under Gen. St. 1878, c. 84, for an alleged unlawful entry and detainer *212of real property. In that court, .judgment of restitution in favor of the plaintiff was rendered, and carried into execution. The defendant appealed to the district court upon questions of law and fact. The cause coming on to be heard in that court, the plaintiff moved that the action be dismissed. Judgment was entered upon such motion, dismissing the action, and awarding restitution of the premises to the defendant. The plaintiff, having appealed from that judgment, and from…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sammons v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Florence Cotton & Iron Co. v. Louisville Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Scroggins v. SolchagaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Bradshaw v. LangumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API