Legal Opinion
Tisdale v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 13, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Norfolk.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The basis of this prosecution is a warrant issued by a police justice of the city of Norfolk, which is in the following words:
“Whereas, Sergeant Gwynn and Officer Debman has this day made complaint and information, on oath, before me, a justice of the said city, that on the 18th day of April, 1912, in said city, Herbert Tisdale did unlawfully maintain and conduct a public nuisance, to-wit: a gambling house, at No. 38 Randolph street, in violation of the law, where divers persons meet for unlawful gambling and have in his possession one faro bank outfit, and unlawfully did keep and exhibit a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gilligan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
- Hickey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Organization for Women v. Operation RescueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Jordan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001