Legal Opinion
Anduaga v. AHRC NYC New Projects, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff was injured in a workplace accident and was awarded workers’ compensation benefits. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the exclusively provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law. The defendant is an alter ego of the plaintiffs employer NYSARC, Inc., such that the plaintiff is relegated to her remedy of workers’ compensation benefits (see Ortega v Noxxen Realty Corp., 26 AD3d 361, 362 [2006]; Crespo v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ramnarine v. Memorial Center for Cancer & Allied DiseasesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Ortega v. Noxxen Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Crespo v. PucciarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Anduaga v. AHRC NYC New Projects, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Samuel v. Fourth Avenue Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Haines v. Verazzano of Dutchess, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Hyman v. Agtuca Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- McDonald v. Winter Bros. Transfer Station Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Haines v. Verazzano of Dutchess, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.