In the Interest of L. L. J.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following the termination of his parental rights, L. L. J.’s father appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because the evidence supported the juvenile court’s judgment, we affirm.
On appeal [in a termination case], we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the juvenile court’s judgment and determine only whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s right to custody should be terminated. We defer to the juvenile court’s factfinding and thus neither weigh the evidence nor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Interest of R. N. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of M. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of B. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of K. J. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of M. A. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Interest of K. E. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In Re KeaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In Re LljCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of J. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008