Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dickson v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1992No. 20972Published

1DissentMowbray, C. J.

Respectfully, I dissent.

Appellant Kevin Dickson was lawfully arrested at a house trailer on an outstanding warrant. A “pat down” search revealed a small plastic tube containing a white powdery residue. Laboratory analysis later identified the residue as methamphetamine.

In Watson v. State, 88 Nev. 196, 198, 495 P.2d 365, 366 (1972), this court concluded that minute quantities of a narcotic could not support the intent element of the crime of possession of a controlled substance. See also Beutler v. State, 88 Nev. 707, 709, 504 P.2d 699, 700 (1972). However, Watson was tried before the 1971…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hamrick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Watson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API