Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ina King v. The New York Telephone Company, Inc., and the Telephone Traffic Union (New York)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 28, 1986No. 277, Docket 85-7536Published

1Dissent

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent because the undisputed facts establish that Ina King’s lawsuit against her union and her former employer is barred by the six-month statute of limitation. In returning this case to the District Court for fact-finding, the majority unsettles the law concerning hybrid section 301/fair representation suits and creates an undefined exposure to damage suits that employers are entitled to believe are time-barred. Moreover, the majority does not instruct the District Court what issues are to be tried, now that summary judgment has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shirley Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., and Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. James C. Schum v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Hull v. Local 414 of the International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
  5. Illis v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API