Legal Opinion

Joshi v. Nair

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1992No. 01573PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition to strike a foreign judgment that was transferred to and duly entered in Pennsylvania.

Appellant presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether Alabama properly exercised in personam jurisdiction over appellant; (2) whether the ex parte amendment of the judgment without notice to appellant violated appellant’s right to due process; (3) whether enforcement of the judgment against appellant is fundamentally unfair; and (4) whether the foreign judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in the Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 1650 East 47th LLC v. 360 Degrees of PerfectionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Thompson v. Santiago, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2001
  3. Com. v. Dukes, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Perlmutter, D. v. Sutton Invest.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API