Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. v. Huber
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Potter County. Hon. Joseph Bottum, Judge. Action by Theo. Hamim Brewing Company, a corporation, against Jo'bn >C. Huber amdl others, to recover upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, 'defendant, Jeli, appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, P. J.
Action to recover amount due on promissory notes executed by all defendants. Trial to court without jury. Findings, conclusions, and judgment for plaintiff. From- the judgment and an order refusing a new trial, the defendant Jeli appealed.
[1] Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment. He does question the sufficiency of the’ evidence to support certain of the findings, hut he has not made it to affirmatively appear that the statement in his brief “contains a statement of all the material evidence received upon the trial,” as required by rule 6 (140 N.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hepner v. WheatleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Denton v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hanson v. LambertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928