Williams v. Kemp
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
WATSON, J.
The theory of the foregoing decision is this: Kemp and Williams, engaged or about to engage in litigation, involving damages liquidated at $750, placed that stun in a bank, agreeing that it should abide the result of the suit. If Kemp recovered the judgment, the money was to be paid to him. If not, it was to be restored to Williams. Kemp recovered judgment. Williams appealed, gave supersedeas bond, and the judgment was affirmed. By that judgment and its affirmance the condition arose under which Kemp was entitled to the money. In the meantime, through failure…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Tucumcari v. BelmoreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- Worthington v. TiptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918