Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kemp

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1927No. 3136Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WATSON, J.

The theory of the foregoing decision is this: Kemp and Williams, engaged or about to engage in litigation, involving damages liquidated at $750, placed that stun in a bank, agreeing that it should abide the result of the suit. If Kemp recovered the judgment, the money was to be paid to him. If not, it was to be restored to Williams. Kemp recovered judgment. Williams appealed, gave supersedeas bond, and the judgment was affirmed. By that judgment and its affirmance the condition arose under which Kemp was entitled to the money. In the meantime, through failure…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Tucumcari v. BelmoreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Worthington v. TiptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API