Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 23, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

“If the defendant is not an inhabitant of the state, and the writ is not served on him in person within the state, but his goods or estate are attached, an attested copy of the writ and of the return of the attachment may be . .. left. .. with his tenant on or near the land attached.” P. L., c. 331, s. 4. The question transferred involves the construction of the phrase, “with his tenant on or near the land attached.”

As a general rule, the return of a sheriff is conclusive upon all matters material to be returned and cannot be contradicted by the parties. Bolles v. Bowen, 45 N. H. 124;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Bank v. Mascoma Flannel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API