Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Prudential Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

Tbe sole question presented by tbis appeal is whether tbe above-entitled action bas been legally removed from tbe Superior Court of Pitt County to the United States District Court at Washington, North Carolina. If the case has been legally removed the judgment should be affirmed. If not so removed, plaintiff, appellant, contends that the judgment is erroneous. Appellee, defendant, contends that the appeal should be dismissed upon an inspection of the record.

This action was instituted in the Superior Court of Pitt County by plaintiff, a resident of Pitt County, against defendant, a corporation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Allison v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. State v. Peterson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Powell v. . Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batts v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API