Legal Opinion
In re Chin Ark Wing
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 12, 1902No. 1,323PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from United States Commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWEEL, District Judge.
The facts in this case are found by the commissioner as follows:
“The defendant arrived in the United States in the year 1882, and was employed as a laundryman during a period of nine years thereafter. Eleven years ago he became a merchant, and was engaged in trade during a period of seven years, as one of the firm doing business in Oxford street, Boston, until the building in which the firm did business was tom down, since when, and during the last four years, the defendant has been employed,as a laundryman, and was so employed when árrested on the complaint made in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Li Sing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. Yong YewDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1897
- United States v. Sing LeeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1896
- United States v. Chung Ki FoonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1897
- United States v. Moy YimDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex parte Wong Yee ToonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1915
- In re Tam ChungDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1915
- United States v. Lim YuenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1914
- United States v. JuenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1904
- Dai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.