Legal Opinion

Buffa v. Belleque

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 11, 2007No. 03C11980; A127476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We write only to discuss his claim that his trial counsel was constitutionally inadequate because counsel failed to object to the imposition of departure sentences without a jury determination of the necessary predicate facts. Because we conclude that, at the time of petitioner’s sentencing, reasonable counsel could have believed that such an objection would be without merit, we affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Petitioner was convicted in 2000 of a number of offenses related to burglaries that he committed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krieg v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Chase v. BlacketterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Gordon v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Perkins v. FhuereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Bishop v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API