Legal Opinion

N.J. Discount Co. v. Telesca

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 18, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is to foreclose a mortgage, and the question is whether it is entitled to priority over another held by the defendant Bernz, assigned to him by one Pietriella. The Pietriella-Bernz mortgage was executed and recorded six months before the complainant's mortgage was given. Pietriella agreed, in writing, with the complainant to postpone his mortgage, and then sold and assigned it to Bernz, who purchased without notice of the postponement. The agreement to postpone was not recorded.

An assignee of a mortgage takes subject to the defenses the mortgagor may have, but not to latent equities…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. PiggottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Vredenburgh v. BurnetNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
  3. Davis v. PiggottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
  4. New York Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. PeckNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sabatino v. D'AloiseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. George F. Perry Son v. MandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API